Wing <wwong8@calstatela.edu> wrote:
W> Hello all,
W> 
W> After reading through the posts on Damon's idea about splitting or at leas
W> starting up "divided" lists, I have the following to say.
W> 
W> Damon, I'm happy for you that you have been able to upgrade your net servi
W> However, there are still many here who do not have that as an option. Plea
W> consider the community before the self.
W> 
W> At a glance, the idea of a split list seems like it would bring back the o
W> days and help people get to know each other again. However, that is only a
W> glance and only if _one_ new list is started. I say this because starting
W> sub-divided new lists will present a thinned out mailing list which would 
W> akin to planting new seeds when the nearby bush is still maturing.
W>

Actually spliting the list is a very bad idea, of which nothing good
will arise out except a lot of ill will and bad feelings.

It seems some of the people who screwed up RAA by insisting that it too be
broken up learned nothing from the experiance and wish to repeat that whole
mess here.


Wwolf should take Damon's suggestion and place it where it belongs. The round
file.